Despite the wireless trend, in-ear headphones with a cable still find their customers. In addition to the potentially better sound quality – Bluetooth transmission is still lossy – there are often purely practical reasons or pure habit that make music lovers reach for the wired in-ear headphones.

Do you like it prefer wireless? Then you will definitely find the right model in our True Wireless In-Ear Headphones Test.

The wired in-ears have a serious advantage over the emerging true-wireless in-ears: if you lose one of the two true-wireless plugs, the whole set, which may not be cheap, becomes unusable and you have to laboriously get one buy a single earphone as a replacement.

Wired in-ears are less likely to get lost because if they fall out of your ear, they are still attached to the cable. However, you can also misplace them and then the loss, depending on the price, is just as painful as with the wireless colleagues. However, you can quickly get by with an inexpensive set as a replacement.

We are constantly hearing about new models and are replacing in-ears that are no longer available with new favourites. Our recommendations are always up to date. We tested a total of 93 in-ear headphones, 55 of which are still available.

More expensive doesn’t necessarily mean better

The in-ear headphones we tested range in price from just under 10 euros to around 300 euros. Of course you can also spend a lot more for in-ears, but for most people 100 euros should be above the pain limit.

The differences in sound quality between cheap and expensive in-ears are not that big, as you would think at first glance – at least if you ignore the very cheap under 20 euros. There are very good-sounding in-ear headphones for as little as 25 euros, but not many.

As the price increases, so does the general level of quality. Again, you can hear differences if you listen carefully, but that always depends on the genre of music. Very good headphones are characterized above all by the fact that they sound good with all styles of music. Most cheaper headphones, on the other hand, do not master all sound situations equally well, but can do everything a little.

But it also happens with high-priced in-ears that they are convincing in one genre of music, but not in another – just not as often. From a price of around 100 euros, all earphones played at a very high level with only minor differences to headphones twice as expensive.

The differences in the upper price segment then become more and more a question of personal preference. Here the question of luxury arises, how much differentiation can the music tolerate without the overall sound artwork suffering as a result: Which one you find best is at some point primarily a matter of taste and that is why, especially with high-priced headphones, it’s up to your own ears to decide.< /p>

The most important thing: the right fit

Each in-ear headphone can only realize its full potential when it sits correctly in the ear. Only when the sound opening is in the right place in front of the eardrum and the seal on the outside fits properly do the listeners perform at their best.

Even the smallest changes in the position of the listeners in the ear have a big impact on the sound. And because everyone has a different auditory canal, the same in-ear headphones don’t sound the same for everyone, regardless of personal preferences and taste.

Therefore, in-ear headphones always have at least three pairs of adapters of different sizes at – even the cheapest. More expensive earphones even come with up to ten adapters.

The full sound only unfolds when the earphones are properly seated

Although they always come in pairs in style and size, that doesn’t mean your left ear can handle the same size as your right. Because ears are like fingerprints – each one is unique. It is therefore quite possible that one auditory canal is narrower than the other, so you have to use different adapters for the left and right.

Finding the right fit for your own ear is not that easy . But you should make the effort. Because even the best in-ear headphones that don’t fit properly don’t sound as good as cheaper ones that fit properly.

Another criterion is good wearing comfort. Ideally, the adapters fit so perfectly that after just a few minutes you can hardly feel them. We didn’t want to succeed with some listeners even after hours of trying out dozens of adapters. Sometimes a headphone just doesn’t fit in one ear.

So it’s worth it in any case, to take the time to adjust the in-ear headphones. Your ears will thank you twice.

Some in-ear headphones from around 100 euros come with foam adapters from Comply or in-house equipped. This foam is rolled up between the thumb and forefinger and thus compressed. Then put in the ear, it adapts perfectly to the shape of the ear canal and at the same time provides an optimal seal.

This Comply-Foam– For many receiver-ear combinations, adapters are the best, sometimes even the only practical solution. Incidentally, many musicians swear by this inexpensive variant of the individual fit when monitoring.

1

of

3

Customized systems are far more expensive: For this, some manufacturers of in-ear headphones work together with hearing aid acousticians, where the customer has so-called otoplastics made, which manufacturers like In-Ear or Rhines then build them into their transducer systems.

Headphones or headset?

< p>In-ear headphones are particularly popular for mobile use because you can always have them with you. Most of the time you listen to music on your smartphone with them.

Many of the earphones we tested are therefore designed as headsets. Since this is a bad compromise for many quality-conscious music listeners, we also tested some in-ears that are not suitable as headsets. Especially in the upper price ranges, the proportion of inline remote controls and microphones is constantly decreasing, but there are also such puristic in-ears for less than 30 euros.

Who doesn’t need a microphone, often gets better sound for the money

In addition, more and more smartphones are appearing that no longer have a headphone jack and rely entirely on Bluetooth.

There are also there are more and more alternatives to smartphones for quality-conscious music listeners. Such digital audio players (DAP) are primarily designed for the best music playback and, unlike many smartphones, are also compatible with HiRes audio formats. An integrated microphone would only be unnecessary ballast there, so that the budget can be better invested in sound optimization or the headphones can simply be made cheaper without a headset.

Eternal frustration: cable break

In-ear headphones’ cables are often a frustrating source of failure, whether due to their tendency to become tangled in unsolvable knots or – often as a result – internally breaking. Then, as soon as you move a bit, there is a loose contact and the music stops – annoying. Cable breaks are by far the most common cause of errors in in-ear headphones.

The manufacturers are aware of these weak points, which usually occur at the connections to the plug or to the converters, and react with appropriate measures.

Careful handling increases the service life

There is often a pronounced kink protection on both the connector and the converters. The insulation and cable are inherently reinforced, with the result, in part, that flexibility suffers. But usually the mishap happens at some point, albeit a little later. Even with in-ears around 100 euros, most have pluggable cables that can be easily replaced in the event of a defect. Plug connections with MMCX have become the standard, so that replacements are not only available from the original manufacturer. Some manufacturers such as Shure even offer Bluetooth modules with MMCX connectors for their in-ears in addition to the normal cable. However, you can also find proprietary connectors, and the replacement cable is only available from the manufacturer.

The cables in the MMCX standard (see figure) cannot be reversed and the right and left are clearly marked on both the cable and the driver housing. Some manufacturers, on the other hand, use their own standards, so the customer has to buy the original in the event of a defect. With Sennheiser there is also protection against polarity reversal of the plugs, the marking of the right and left channel is also clear and the sensitive pins are mounted somewhat countersunk for their own protection. Newcomers like Ikko are a little more down-to-earth: the direction of insertion is not defined, which can result in polarity reversal and a loss of sound quality. The sensitive plugs are also exposed and can easily bend or even break off. The labeling of the right and left channel, on the other hand, is also clear here.

If all this is too complicated for you, Bluetooth in-ear headphones in To consider. Here are our tests of Bluetooth in-ear headphones , whose ear pieces are connected with a cable and completely wireless in-ears

However, they can You can also do your part to ensure that you benefit from intact cables for as long as possible: If you realize how fine the individual strands are under the plastic insulation and consider that the copper used as a conductor is not one of the particularly high-tensile metals, you will you might be more careful with the cables of your in-ear headphones. Above all, you shouldn’t quickly stuff the in-ear headphones into your pocket, wrapped in a ball and then grab a cable loop and yank out the good pieces again – otherwise it’s only a matter of time before they break.

In-ear headphones up to 30 euros

Inexpensive in-ear headsets for less than 30 euros are usually not too richly equipped, but three to four pairs of adapters are always included here – exclusively made of silicone and in at least three sizes. If you mean well, you can also include a simple fabric transport bag or a small net.

Some of the very cheap in-ear headphones are hardly better than the headsets that come with the smartphone. However, our current recommendations all stand out. Even the price tip 1More Piston Fit E1009 for around 15 euros makes some plugs from the scope of delivery look pretty old, this applies to both the sound and the processing quality.

Some models, such as the CX 100 from Sennheiser, are also not suitable for smartphones at all – the obligatory microphone for the Make a phone call. Such in-ears are only committed to the best sound – who likes to be disturbed by the phone?

Brief overview: our recommendations

Test winner

Sennheiser CX 100

Show all prices

The Sennheiser CX 100 are almost spherical and very tiny. Gross motor users might need some time until they have inserted the tiny ones in the ear on the spot. In the ear, however, the CX 100 are hardly noticeable, even the wearer quickly got used to the comfortable tiny ones and hardly notices them after a few minutes. Placed optimally in the ear, the Sennheiser in-ears unfold an unexpectedly natural sound experience. They work in a very differentiated way, especially in the high-midrange and should therefore provide musical enjoyment across genres.

Sound tip

Final E500

Show all prices

The slim Final E500 are the cheapest earphones from the E series, but they only differ slightly from the significantly more expensive ones on the outside Siblings. Only plastic is used for the housing, which successfully dampens vibrations that do not belong to the music. Even with the cheapest Final earphones, the eartips can be swiveled perfectly into the ear canal and remain there comfortably, tightly and securely. They deliver an amazingly spatial sound image.

Price tip

1More Piston Fit E1009

Show all prices

The 1More Piston Fit E1009 is surprisingly well made for its price, so it’s easy to get over the fact that apart from three fitting pieces and one Inline microphone nothing is included. The housing and even the plug are made entirely of metal – and the in-ears can be easily inserted into the ear correctly thanks to their slightly curved shape. The sound is also correspondingly mature and can easily stand up to some smartphone headsets.

For athletes

Sony MDR-XB510AS

Show all prices

For athletes, the Sony MDR-XB510AS is the first choice when it comes to this to plug a cheap headset into the smartphone in the gym or while jogging. There are plenty of fitting pieces and additional so-called wings – i.e. wings – included, so that the correct and secure fit is also guaranteed during sports. In terms of sound, they deliver exactly the motivating punch that you expect during a workout, without exaggerating the bass – after all, nobody needs an eardrum massage. You can even take the Sonys with you in the shower, because according to protection class IPX5 they are protected against water jets.

Comparison table

Test winner

Sennheiser CX 100

Klangtipp

Final E500

Preistipp

1More Piston Fit E1009

Für Sportler

Sony MDR-XB510AS

Final E1000

Beyerdynamic Beat Byrd

1More E1003

Panasonic RP-TCM130

Mackie CR-Buds

Sony MDR-EX450AP

Panasonic RP-TCM360

Panasonic RP-TCM115

Panasonic RP-HJE125E

Klim Fusion

Apple EarPods

Sennheiser CX 2.00i

Roccat Syva

Liam & Daan Swan Ceramic

Samsung EG920

• Hervorragender Klang
• Sehr komfortabler Sitz

• Wenig Zubehör

• Hervorragender Klang
• Sehr komfortabler Sitz

• Knappe Ausstattung

• Guter Klang
• Hochwertige Fertigung
• Günstiger Preis

• Sparsam ausgestattet

• Guter Klang
• Perfekter Sitz und sicherer Halt
• Nach IPX5 gegen Strahlwasser geschützt
• Üppig ausgestattet

• Sehr natürlicher Klang
• Einfaches Handling
• Sehr komfortabler Sitz

• Sparsam ausgestattet

• Sehr gute Klangqualität
• Hoher Tragekomfort

• Nicht als Headset zu gebrauchen

• Ordentlicher Klang
• Solide gefertigt

• Lassen sich schwer einsetzen

• Gute Ausstattung

• Schlechter Sitz

• Balanced sound

< li>Solidly manufactured

• Comfortable seat

• Remote control has only one button
• Without transport bag

< img alt="Best in-ear headphones test: Sony MDR-EX450AP" class="attachment-ab_prodbox size-ab_prodbox" height="300" src="https://www.allesbeste.de/wp-content/uploads /2017/08/Sony-MDR-EX450AP-e1539935877264-291x300.jpg" title="The best in-ear headphones 22" width="291"/>

• Good sound quality with emphasis on bass

• Currently a little over the 30 euro mark

• Comfortable fit

< ul>

Sounds quite thin and powerless

• Including microphone
• Four colors available

• Sounds quite thin

• Available in 10 colors
• Sounds good quite balanced
• Small adapters more suitable for children
• Reasonable price

• Not very stable

< i mg alt="Test best in-ear headphones: KLIM Fusion" class="attachment-ab_prodbox size-ab_prodbox" height="277" src="https://www.allesbeste.de/wp-content/uploads/2018 /08/KLIM-Fusion-1-e1539935913553-300x277.jpg" title="The best in-ear headphones 26" width="300"/>

• Good sound quality with a clear emphasis on bass
• Very good equipment

• The bass emphasis might be too strong for some
• The volume control is designed as a slider

• Good sound when they fit properly

• No fitting pieces but one size fits all

• Neatly manufactured

• Heavily exaggerated Accents in the highs

• Possibly a cheap Beats alternative

• Far too bass-heavy< /li>

• Supplied with 10 pairs of adapters

• Tend to boomy deep bass

• Sound is okay

• Only delivered in a plastic bag
• Can hardly be adjusted to the ears

PreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleich

Produktdetails einblenden

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

28 Ohm

119 dB

1,2 m ohne Mikrofon

4 x Passstücke

10 Gramm

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

98 dB

1,2 m ohne Mikrofon

5 Paar Passstücke

15 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

32 Ohm

100 dB

1,25 m mit Mikrofon

3 x Passstücke

14 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

56 Ohm

106 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

4 Paar Silikon-Passstücke, 3 Paar Ohrbügel, Clip, Kabelreiter, Transport-Tasche

9 Gramm

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

102 dB

1,2 m ohne Mikrofon

5 x Passstücke

15 Gramm

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

18 Ohm

104 dB

1,5 m ohne Mikrofon

3 Paar Passstücke

5 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

32 Ohm

98 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

4 x Passstücke, Aufbewahrungs-Puck

13 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

95 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

3 x Passstücke

13 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

95 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

4 Paar Silikon-Passstücke

7 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

40 Ohm

103 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

4 Paar Passstücke, Kabelreiter, Tragebeutel

ca. 12 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

14 Ohm

93 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

3 x Passstücke

14 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

109 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

3 x Passstücke

12 Gramm

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

97 dB

1,1 m ohne Mikrofon

3 x Passstücke

4 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker, Adapter für PC

16 Ohm

k. A.

1,5 m mit Mikrofon

6 Paar Passstücke (3 Silikon, 3 Schaumstoff), Kabelreiter, Tragebeutel, Adapter für PC

12 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

41 Ohm

k. A.

1,15 m mit Mikrofon

Aufbewahrungscase

k. A.

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

28 Ohm

119 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

4 Paar Passstücke

15 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

32 Ohm

96 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

k. A.

k. A.

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

95 dB

1,25 m ohne Mikrofon

10 Paar Passstücke

16 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

32 Ohm

99 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

3 Paar Passstücke

12 Gramm

Testsieger: Sennheiser CX100

Fast kugelrund und sehr winzig sind dieSennheiser CX 100. Gross motor users might need some time until they have inserted the tiny ones in the ear on the spot. In the ear, however, the CX 100 are hardly noticeable, even the wearer quickly got used to the comfortable tiny ones and hardly notices them after a few minutes. Placed optimally in the ear, the Sennheiser in-ears unfold an unexpectedly natural sound experience. They work in a very differentiated way, especially in the high-midrange and should therefore provide musical enjoyment across genres.

Test winner

Sennheiser CX 100

Show all prices

The Sennheiser CX 100 is only very rudimentarily equipped, but you should beware of the narrow accessories and Don’t let the small design fool you. The small CX 100 is not a replacement for a full-fledged headset, but is entirely committed to the sound.

That’s why the Sennheiser hasn’t integrated an inline microphone into the cable, and a transport bag is also non-existent. After all, a total of four pairs of adapters made of soft silicone are included.

The right/left marking is difficult to read, but can be felt all the more reliably, you can connect the in-ears for the left channel feel three points clearly. Nevertheless, the CX 100 with their smooth, spherical shape are a bit fiddly to use, especially with larger fingers.

1

from

3

On the other hand, the tiny plugs are hardly noticeable once they are in the ear. They are so comfortable to wear that we hardly notice them after just a few minutes. The soft silicone tips snuggle up nicely and seal perfectly, so that you get your money’s worth in terms of sound.

They deliver a nice, airy sound and fine resolution in the mid-high range. After a slight correction of the seat, they also put a lot of pressure in the bass range and deliver a quite natural balance across the entire frequency spectrum.

Alternatives< /h3>

Other inexpensive models also offer a lot at a low price. We present other recommended devices below.

Comfortable: Final E500

The Final E500 is that Entry-level model of the E-series from Final. The slim sleeves in which the drivers sit are made of acoustically dampening plastic, while the basic technical design is the same as that of the more expensive siblings.

Sound tip

Final E500

Show all prices

The right/left marking is difficult to read because there is no colored marking and the corresponding imprint is in the same color as the case. There is no inline remote control with microphone here, nor is there a bag or case for transport. Instead, the E500 a total of five pairs of adapters that allow a very differentiated adjustment to the individual ear.

1

by < p>2

The eartips of the Final E500 are placed on the sleeves as normal, but due to the construction there is a slight play, so that they can follow a slight pan and then fit even better into the auditory canal. However, normal adapters do not fit, they have to be specially designed for the Final headphones. With just a little instinct, however, they quickly sit in the right place, seal very well and can develop their great sound.

The E500 deliver this Then also: tonally very balanced in principle, they deliver the punch that we still missed with the Final E1000. In addition, the E500 offers a sound with enormous width and depth gradation, at least in this price range. This makes it our current sound recommendation.

Price tip: 1More Piston Fit E1009

Cleanly milled metal housing, an inline microphone and mature sound, you get all of this with the 1More Piston Fit E1009 for significantly less than 20 euros. The in-ears largely follow the design and, depending on their possibilities, the sound of the more expensive headphones from 1More.

Price tip

1More Piston Fit E1009

Show all prices

The 1More Piston Fit E1009 doesn’t look cheap at all and are also well equipped, after all there is even an inline microphone, along with a one-button remote control, so that at least a phone call can be answered lets. However, volume or track control are not possible with them – and the included ear tips in three sizes must also be sufficient.

They do that too, thanks to the slightly angled shape, the in-ears are quickly inserted, the right- /Left marking is not on the cable but clearly visible on the plugs. If necessary, the microphone can serve as a guide, it is integrated into the cable on the right in-ear. The three adapters should be sufficient for most ears as they are very soft, adapt well and seal the ear well.

1

p> of

3

The Piston Fit E1009 stand out among their peers at a similar price in terms of sound. Despite the usual boost in the low tones, you get the feeling that music was also heard during development. The difference to the other 15-euro headphones or even the cheaper ones affects all frequency ranges. You can hear more tones, the bass is authentic – without appearing thickened – the spatiality of the stage can be perceived for the first time. If the budget doesn’t allow for more, then you should definitely consider the Piston Fit E1009. In addition to their sound quality, they are also manufactured to such a high standard that they should have a fairly long service life.

For athletes: Sony MDR-XB510AS

The Sony MDR-XB510AS is available in red, green and black in addition to our blue test patterns. So they should go with all kinds of sportswear, because they are intended for sports – that can hardly be denied.

For athletes

Sony MDR-XB510AS

Show all prices

On top of that, the MDR-XB510AS are also quite comprehensive fitted. Finally, in addition to the four pairs of adapters, there are also three pairs of wings in different sizes, which are intended to provide more support in the auricle. A clip and a so-called cable clip round off the equipment, and the in-ears and the necessary accessories can also be stored in the transport bag when you are on the go.

1< /p> from

3

An inline microphone with a button is integrated, because you can make one or the other important phone call, especially when jogging or in the gym. The MDR-XB510AS are made entirely of plastic and are very well sealed, so they meet protection class IPX5, i.e. they are protected against the ingress of water jets. So you don’t have to take off the Sonys after exercising and can keep them on even in the shower.

The MDR-XB510AS do protrude Due to their design, they are very far out of the ears, but are therefore also very good to use for people with gross motor skills or with sweaty fingers. In terms of sound, they are on the usual level for their class, with a rich bass boost. However, this is less pronounced than the name and description on the packaging want to convey. In contrast to the test winner, the upper mids and less the highs are raised here. So they don’t sound quite as brilliant.

Also tested

Final E1000

The Final E1000 has long been the entry-level model of Final’s E series. The slim sleeves in which the drivers sit are made of plastic here, but the basic technical design is the same as in the more expensive siblings.

There is also no inline remote control with microphone here, either little like a bag or case for transport. For this purpose, the Final E1000 comes with a total of five pairs of adapters, which enable a very differentiated adjustment to the individual ear.

1

by

3

The cleanly resolved mids and the brilliant mid-high range leave nothing to be desired, only in a direct comparison with the competition could one or the other use a little emphasis in the low bass, which the Final E500 for about the same price.

The Final E1000 is definitely a good choice for friends the pure, unadulterated sound at a low price that is not interrupted by phone calls.

Beyerdynamic Beat Byrd

With the Beat Byrd Beyerdynamic probably offers the cheapest in-ears in the company’s history. That this is something special can already be seen from the fact that the Heilbronn-based company currently only offers these headphones in their own shop. Here you can then order a fine transport case at the same time for an additional charge of almost 10 euros.

On an inline microphone and remote control you have to do without the Beat Byrd, however – they are not available for an extra charge. The scope of delivery includes three pairs of adapters. The Beat Byrd is very easy to insert into the ear, thanks to its flat housing it hardly protrudes outwards and is not perceived as annoying in the ears even over a longer period of time.

It is surprisingly neutral in terms of sound, with a mid resolution that is very good for this price range, so that lovers of vocal music will enjoy it. However, the low frequency range also comes into its own. Overall, the transition between the bass and midrange is very homogeneous and pleasantly sonorous. In terms of sound, the Beat Byrd is a real stroke of luck – if you can do without a microphone and remote control because you are not making a call anyway or have connected a pure audio player instead of your smartphone.

1More E1003

With the 1More E1003 you don’t have to dig deeper into your pocket than with our price tip. There are even more accessories for the same money: the rubber puck, on which the cable and in-ears are wrapped upon delivery, can also be used for everyday transport. A total of four adapters are included, but only in three sizes. The inline microphone and ear tips are made of high-quality metal. Even sound-wise, it’s quite similar to the E1009. Unfortunately, the path to an acceptable sound experience with the E1003 is a little further, since the in-ears cannot be inserted into the ear as easily as with the Piston Fit E1009, so that in case of doubt they cannot play out their full sound quality. That’s why they’re only second choice at this price.

Panasonic RP-TCM130

The Panasonic RP-TCM130 is priced at the level of our price tip, but can at best keep up in terms of equipment. It is also equipped with a microphone, one-button remote control and three pairs of adapters. The in-ears are shaped in such a way that they sit very well in the outer ear, but the sound funnels are too short, so that you have to help a little so that the auditory canal is sealed well. This is how you get the extra bass promised on the package, even if only for a short time. All in all, the RP-TCM130 aren’t convincing, especially since they don’t really stand out from the cheaper in-ears from the same company in terms of equipment or sound.

Mackie CR-Buds

Mackie actually comes from the professional sector, where, in addition to monitors and mixers for the studio, they also have one or two headphones in their portfolio. The CR buds are currently Mackie’s cheapest headphones and offer decent features and very good sound at a low price. The CR-Buds are currently only available from Thomann, at Amazon they are only available at the price of the more expensive CR-Buds+. The Mackie CR Buds are the most affordable in-ears Mackie offers. The brand is likely to be better known among musicians, as it mainly produces mixers, loudspeakers and other tools for the recording studio.

The strengths of the CR buds clearly lie in the sound and the wearing comfort. And they play it off skilfully: they are easy to insert and seal perfectly, so that deep tones in particular can unfold perfectly. The CR buds reproduce bass and treble cleanly, but this cannot hide the fact that they have a slight loudness character. However, this is quite intentional, because it gives you a voluminous sound even at low volume. Meanwhile, the cable tends towards microphonics: Rubbing noises on clothing are almost completely transmitted to the ears.

Sony MDR-EX450AP

Only a few Our former favorite in this price range is currently located above the 30-euro pain threshold. The Sony MDR-EX450AP is easy to handle, offers exceptionally good sound quality for the price and comes with four adapters and a reasonable storage bag. Once the MDR-EX450AP is used correctly, it knows how to convince with a fairly balanced sound – of course not without a certain preference for the bass. They are crisp, precise and in no way tend to thicken the sound unnecessarily. The fine resolution is not neglected either, so that you can even enjoy classical music with the Sony.

Panasonic RP-TCM360

The Panasonic RP-TCM360 comes with three adapters, otherwise there are no other accessories. However, thanks to the inline microphone and start/stop button in the inline remote control, it is suitable as a cheap replacement for the smartphone headset. While it doesn’t sound significantly better than its peers at the same price, it’s quite comfortable in the ear.

Panasonic RP-TCM115

For With the Panasonic RP-TCM115, you can even get in-ear headphones with an inline microphone for under ten euros. The three adapters are kept in the color of the housing, the RP-TCM115 is available in blue, white and black in addition to pink. However, it does not deliver any surprises in terms of sound, like almost all Panasonics in the test it simply sounds too thin, but it is the cheapest with a microphone.

Panasonic RP-HJE125E< /h3>

We received the Panasonic RP-HJE125E in an orange version, it is one of the cheapest on the market and is available in a total of ten color variants actually intended for children. There are only three adapters as accessories, but they are nice in the color of the housing. An inline microphone or a remote control are not included for the price. It is easy to insert and then sits comfortably in the right place, even in smaller ears. It even sounds quite balanced right away and only when you compare it with our slightly more expensive price tip, for example, do you hear how much sound the RP-HJE125E suppresses – in all frequency ranges.

Klim Fusion

The Klim Fusion is delivered in a metal can. It’s practical because it holds all the accessories that come with it, but it’s a bit bulky in the bag. That’s why the Fusion also comes with a storage bag. Rare in this price range, the Klim Fusion comes with six pairs of adapters, three of which are made of silicone and three more are made of Comply-like foam. The manufacturer also includes an adapter for tablets, PCs and the like, since these sometimes have two separate sockets for the headset. The plugs are very comfortable in the ears, although the housings are not exactly the smallest. When it comes to selecting the volume setting on the inline microphone, Klim goes its own way: a slide potentiometer is used here instead of a rocker switch. However, the setting sliders are very susceptible to dirt.

In terms of sound, the Fusion fulfills the promise that is already emblazoned on the packaging and makes a lot of steam underneath. The bass is more springy than crisp. The level is decent, but conceals the fact that the bass doesn’t go down as deep as the headphones would have you believe.

In view of the slim price and the extremely good equipment, such small tricks can be easily gotten over . If you like round, rich bass, you can get a good bargain here.

Apple EarPods

Sponsored by Apple’s EarPods can almost only be found as plagiarisms online, whether on Amazon, eBay or other shops. Even if the prices seem so tempting, you should rather keep your hands off them. If you want Apple EarPods, it’s best to only buy them directly from Apple. The construction without adapters is fascinating at first, but less practical with the wired EarPods than with the Bluetooth version, the AirPods. The cable represents an additional tensile load, so that the EarPods do not sit as securely in the ear as the AirPods.

Nevertheless, they are quite balanced and those who do not need an eardrum massage can enjoy the unusual design of the EarPods. Those who value both fit and good sound will get more with our favorite – and for less money.

Sennheiser CX 2.00i

All three testers also agreed on the Sennheiser: The CX 2.00i is more reserved in the low bass compared to other headphones, but it is more reserved in the treble strong accents that are sometimes uncomfortably exaggerated. It is neatly made and the stable “grips” on the cable feeds allow relatively easy use in the ear.

Roccat Syva

The The sound of the Roccat Syva is far too bass-driven – so much so that everything else is swept aside. Roccat usually serves the gaming scene, which can be seen in the design and the tuning. Therefore, it may pass as a cheap Beats alternative if the look is more important than the sound. But there are much better in-ears for the price.

Liam & Daan Swan Ceramic

Without a case, but with 10 pairs of adapters in three different sizes, the Liam & Daan Swan Ceramic delivered. It has the same case as the slightly more expensive Rock Zircon in the higher price category. In terms of sound, both are not convincing. The sound of Liam & Daan Swan Ceramic has a pronounced loudness character with a tendency to booming deep bass and a nasal presence range.

Samsung EG920

The Samsung EG920 is just packed in a nasty plastic bag. The standard headphones that Samsung ships with its smartphones are difficult to adjust to the ears because they are not typical ear canal headphones. However, if they fit, they don’t even sound bad.

In-ear headphones for around 50 euros

With the price, the weight also increases – at least that’s what you could assume, if you look at the weight of the in-ears in the class from 50 euros.

In this price range, relatively little has changed. However, some in-ears, which were initially around 100 euros or more, are slowly approaching 50 euros. With them you can get a lot more equipment for a relatively small surcharge and often improve the sound a bit at the same time. So it’s worth taking a look at the models in the next higher price range.

In the price range around 50 euros, the proportion of metal in the driver housing is already increasing and the in-ears are usually also significantly larger. Even the inline remote control with the microphone has a nice and solid metal sleeve on some headphones.

Brief overview: Our recommendations

Test winner

Final E3000

Show all prices

With the Final E3000 we have an extraordinarily natural-sounding in-ear for 50 euros. Thanks to the special concept for a perfect yet comfortable fit in the auditory canal, the final can optimally develop its musical qualities. The Final E3000C with microphone and one-button remote control is available for just a few euros more.

Also good

Meze 12 Classics

Show All Prices

The Meze 12 Classics is one of the cheapest in-ears from the Romanian manufacturer, wood is used as the housing material, high-quality workmanship and definitely an eye-catcher. The 12 Classics are also convincing in terms of features and sound quality.

Price tip

Sennheiser CX 300S

< p>

All Show prices

The CX 300S is another real minimalist from Sennheiser, the in-ears are so small that they hardly noticeable in the ear. Nevertheless, they are easier to use than the cheaper CX 100 from the same company. In terms of sound, however, they are clearly among the big ones.

Equipment tip

1More E1001

Show all prices

Hardly any in-ear set in this price range is as generously equipped as the 1More E1001, in addition to a more than sufficient number of different adapters, there are various adapters and a great leather storage case. Fortunately, the sound doesn’t fall by the wayside.

Comparison table

Test winner

Final E3000

Also good

Meze 12 Classics

Price tip

Sennheiser CX 300S

Equipment tip

1More E1001

Beyerdynamic Soul BYRD

Sennheiser Momentum M2

SoundMagic E80C

Xiaomi QTER02JY

SoundMagic E50C

Sennheiser CX5.00i

1More E1025

Final E2000

Mackie CR Buds Plus

CYBR PNK

Teufel Move

• Very natural sound
• High quality processing
• Comfortable fit
• Without microphone



• Very good sound
• Extraordinary design
• Very well equipped
• Little punch in the bass range



• Very good sound
• Comfortable fit< /li>
• Inexpensive
• Frugally equipped



• Modern look
• Good sound
• Slight emphasis on the presence range< /li>



• Very good sound
• Good features

< /p>

• Excellent sound
• Comfortable fit
• Little equipment



• Very good sound
• High wearing comfort
• Overall not quite as good a sound as the test winner



• Strengths of two converter systems were implemented
• Very good workmanship
• Good sound
• Slight tendency to center emphasis< /li>



• Convinces the sound of everyone Type of music
• Suitable for Apple and Android smartphones
• Housing mostly made of plastic
• Voices come into their own
• There are often biting peaks in the highs

< ul>

• Available in many colors
• Cheap

• Discolored sound
• Does not fit perfectly

• Comfortable fit
• Good Equipment

• Sounds too thin

• Comprehensive features
• Good Workmanship

• The upper midrange is a bit over-represented

• Excellently equipped
• Comfortable seat

• Blades too dull

• Good sound

• Equipped economically

Price comparisonPrice comparison Price comparisonPrice comparison Price comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparison Price comparison

Show product details

3.5mm 3-pin jack plug

16 ohms< /p>

100 dB

1.2 m without microphone

5 pairs of fittings, earhook, carry pouch

14 grams

3.5mm 4-pin jack plug

16 ohms< /p>

101 dB

1.2 m with microphone

5 pairs of adapters 1 x Comply), cable clip, hard case

6 grams

3.5mm 4-pin jack plug

18 ohms

1 18 dB

1.2 m with microphone

4 pairs Fittings

12 grams

3.5mm-4 -pole jack plug

32 Ohm

99 dB

1.2 m with microphone

8 pairs of adapters, storage box, Airplane adapter, cable clip

18 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

18 Ohm

103 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

5 Paar Passstücke, Kabelclip, Hardcase

6 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

18 Ohm

118 dB

1,3 m mit Mikrofon

4 Paar Passstücke, Hardcase

16 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

64 Ohm

102 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

7 Paar Passstücke, davon 3 Comply Paare, Kabelclip, Transporttasche, VoIP-Adapter

13 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

98 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

3 Paar Passstücke

14 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

51 Ohm

102 dB

1,2 m, 3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker mit Fernbedienung und Mikro

8 Paar Passstücke, davon auch 3 Paar Comply, Kabelclip, Transporttasche

13 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

18 Ohm

118 dB

1,2 m, 3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker mit Fernbedienung und Mikro

4 Paar Passstücke, Transportbox

16 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

32 Ohm

98 dB

1,25 m mit Mikrofon

15 Gramm

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

102 dB

1,2 m ohne Mikrofon

5 Paar Passstücke, Ohrbügel, Tragebeutel

12 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

8 Ohm

94 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

4 Paar Silikon-Passstücke, 3 Paar Schaumstoff-Passstücke, Transport-Tasche

14 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

94 dB

1,3 m mit Mikrofon

4 Paar Silikon-Passstücke, 1 Paar Schaumstoff-Passstücke, Transport-Case

7 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

112 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

3 Paar Passstücke, Aufbewahrungsbox

14 Gramm

Test winner: Final E3000

The Final E3000 In-ears are made of high-quality stainless steel, many ear tips of different sizes and even two brackets to run the cable behind the ear are included. This final also does without a microphone and a remote control, so no compromises are made here for such trivial things as telephoning, at least not in terms of sound quality.

Test winner

Final E3000

Show all prices

The shape of the in-ears has a number of ergonomic advantages: the adapters can be easily attached, and then you have a secure grip even with two fingers , to insert the in-ears accurately into the ear. A total of five pairs of ear tips are included as accessories, as well as two brackets that help to lay the cable behind the ears if necessary – an effective measure against the transmission of cable noise, the so-called microphonic effect.

The everything can be accommodated in the small transport bag, which is also included in the scope of delivery. It’s kept quite simple, but it doesn’t make the entire set unnecessarily expensive and serves its purpose.

1

by

3

As is usual with Final, the adapters do not sit firmly on the flange, but swivel slightly to the side if necessary in order to fit better into the auditory canal.

It works so well that the Final E3000 fit perfectly and let their sound unfold freely. The E3000 sound very natural and balanced right from the start, there are no frequencies that are particularly preferred or disadvantaged. On the back – i.e. opposite the eartip – each of the two in-ears has a fine filter, which covers a kind of bass reflex opening. The E3000 has this targeted support in the low frequencies ahead of colleagues such as the cheaper E1000. The E3000 descends even deeper into the bass cellar and thus expands the transmitted frequency range downwards.

Everything is right here at the asking price: workmanship, equipment, wearing comfort and sound of the Final E3000 set standards in this price range, you only have to do without the microphone for sound reasons, if you don’t want that, you can alternatively use the Final E3000C, that’s part of it.

Alternatives

In the area around 50 euros there are even more models that are convincing in terms of sound. We therefore have further recommendations for you below.

Challenger: Meze 12 Classics

The Meze 12 Classics, on the other hand, has a microphone and even a one-button remote control integrated into the cable. The inexpensive in-ear set from Meze is also quite well equipped in other respects. One of the five pairs of ear tips is made of memory foam, a cable clip is also included and everything can be accommodated in the round, solid hard case.

That’s good too

< p class="product-box-headline product-box-headline--secondary">Meze 12 Classics

Show all prices

By the way, the wood is supposed to be walnut, the other parts of the in-ears are made of aluminum. But the Meze 12 Classics is not just an eye-catcher, it can also convince in terms of wearing comfort, once used with the right ear tips, you can easily forget that you have any in your ears at all.

1

from

3

In terms of sound, the 12 Classics is more on the warmly tuned side, so there are no nasty peaks in the form of overzealously hissing S-sounds. On the other hand, it has very finely resolved mid and mid-high tones, from which vocal passages in particular benefit. The Meze 12 Classics makes the transitions from the fundamental to the mid-range to the mid-high range without any audible peaks or dips. Since it only pushes very little in the bass – if at all – it will not please everyone or not in every genre.

If you can do without the last kick of deep bass, in favor of a colorful high-resolution middle and middle treble sequence, who also likes unusual material combinations and good equipment, should definitely check out the Meze 12 Classics.

Price tip: Sennheiser CX 300S

The Sennheiser CX 300S are fine, small in-ears that are very easy to use and very sound good. In addition to the in-ears and the coiled cable, there is also space for four pairs of adapters in the carrying bag provided.

Price tip

Sennheiser CX 300S

Show all prices

As usual with Sennheiser headphones, the right/left marking is also very easy to feel. If in doubt, however, you can also refer to the fact that the inline microphone with one-button operation is integrated in the cable of the right in-ear. They may be tiny, but due to their design, they offer enough grip for the fingers that they can be used better than, for example, the CX 100, also from Sennheiser . They are also slightly curved, so they land in the correct position almost automatically.

1

by

3

p>

The ear tips of the CX 300S are made of very soft silicone and nestle gently, but still securely, so that after just a few minutes you no longer feel that they are stuck in your ears. Nevertheless, they seal perfectly, so that the CX 300S can develop their full sound freely.

In addition to a subtle loudness character, the CX 300S deliver a pleasantly natural sound that still delivers relaxed enjoyment even after long listening sessions – and at a fair price.

Features wonder: 1More E1001

Headphones, especially in-ears, are increasingly becoming fashionable accessories. The sound often falls by the wayside – not so with the 1More E1001. They look a lot like jewellery, partly because the metal housing is very cleanly manufactured. In addition, 1More does not scrimp on ear tips in different sizes and made of different materials, nor on other accessories.

Equipment tip

1More E1001

Show all prices

Headphones, cables, airplane adapters and fittings are housed separately in small boxes. There are nine pairs of adapters, three of which are in foam. The solid leather case has a magnetic closure.

The in-ears have the same angled shape as most other plugs from 1More and other manufacturers. It should make it easier to insert it correctly into the auditory canal, which shouldn’t pose any problems with the quite large housings of the E1001 anyway, even large fingers can quickly find a grip on the plug. The fact that they stick out so far out of their ears ultimately only bothers small minds, after all, as I said, the E1001 are anything but ugly.

1< /p> from

3

It is hardly surprising that the E1001 also show a slight trend towards loudness, i.e. bass and treble are slightly raised and the mids are slightly lowered. In a direct comparison with the CX 300S from Sennheiser, which is tuned very similarly, you miss a bit of glitter in the highs, the 1More E1001 as a precautionary measure. Overall, however, the 1More knows how to convince in terms of sound, in terms of equipment it shows what is possible in this price range.

Also tested

Beyerdynamic Soul BYRD

The Beyerdynamic Soul Byrd is the big one Brother of Beat Byrd. Design and technology are similar, the Soul Byrd is a little more generously equipped and also comes with an inline microphone for use on a smartphone. Unlike many other in-ears, the Soul Byrd are not pushed deep into the ear canal, but remain at the entrance. The adapters still seal perfectly and the Soul Byrd sit extremely comfortably. They sound very balanced and bring a good pinch of joy to the game, so there is no room for boredom.

Sennheiser Momentum M2

The Sennheiser Momentum M2 has been around for so long that it was our favorite for a long time, albeit in a higher price range. It is now well under 100 euros, but it is no longer available everywhere. The Momentum M2 sounds harmonious and balanced and shines above all with classical music and voice-oriented ensembles. He dissolves large string orchestras beautifully warm and fine, piano sounds brilliant and precise.

In terms of sound, the Sennheiser still easily play in the upper league of in-ear headphones that are up to twice as expensive. When it comes to fitting pieces and other useful accessories, the competition has caught up. Sennheiser only includes the usual four pairs of silicone adapters.

Nevertheless, the Momentum M2 is still a worthwhile purchase as long as you can still get it.

SoundMagic E80C

The Soundmagic E80C can be used with the iPhone (except iPhone 7 and later) as well as with most Android smartphones. This worked very well in tests with different smartphones, including the remote control. Another adapter divides the cable into headphone and microphone plugs. As a headset, it even fits various tablets, laptops and PCs.

Nine pairs of adapters are included with the handset, three of which are made of Comply Foam in sizes S, M and L. A small, solid case is also included in the scope of delivery . When used, the plugs are hardly bulky, and there should also be the right adapters for all possible ear canals – in short: the SoundMagic have long been among the most comfortable in-ears that we have used. In addition to the comfort, they can also convince in terms of sound.

Xiaomi QTER02JY

This is how it can happen: the Xiaomi QTER02JY is our former favorite in the class up to 30 euros – then the market obviously reacted and made the good piece more expensive. In the price range around 50 euros, the competition is significantly stronger and the Xiaomi no longer makes it into a recommendation. In addition to the classic dynamic converter, there is a balanced armature converter in each of the earbuds of the Xiaomi QTER02JY. Xiaomi uses the strengths of both converter systems and has coordinated them very well.

The sound is balanced tonally and conveyed with a slight tendency towards mid-range emphasis. The bass also comes into its own, because the Xiaomi QTER02JY pushes it along slightly, which is definitely wanted, but mostly happens in a controlled and contoured manner.

SoundMagic E50C

Excellently adaptable adapters, great workmanship and a sound that is always good from rap to classical music – all this is offered by the SoundMagic E50C. In the variant with a microphone, it is around 50 euros, but if you decide against a microphone, you can get it for 40 euros. Without showing off, the E50C makes every piece of music look good.

Sennheiser CX5.00i

The Sennheiser CX5.00i sounds unpretentious, offers a healthy bass foundation with a well-dosed fundamental tone reproduction with perfectly selected fitting pieces, but quickly tends towards slightly biting peaks in the treble. Voices get the fullest attention from the Sennheiser because the mids, which are so important, are nicely differentiated but still not overly present. The sturdy case that comes with the product also has a way of winding up the cable reasonably neatly, which should improve the service life of the in-ears.

1More E1025

The 1More E1025 obviously serve more of a fashion aspect. They are available in various colors and go with almost every fashion as an accessory. However, they are difficult to use because the in-ears are much too clumsy in crucial places. It’s certainly not just the inadequate fit that’s responsible for the discoloration of the E1025, especially in the mids, there are better alternatives even from 1More.

Final E2000< /h3>

The Final E2000 has the same structure as all in-ears of the E series, but in contrast to the cheaper E1000, the housing here is the same already made of metal. The wearing comfort corresponds to that of the other Final models due to the clever technology with the ear tips. In terms of sound, however, it cannot quite keep up, it sounds too thin for that. Both the low and the basic tone range are quite reserved and don’t get the necessary substance even with the different adapters. The handset is also available as Final E2000C including microphone and one-button remote control.

Mackie CR-Buds Plus

TheMackie CR-Buds+ are designed completely differently than the CR buds without a plus: Two converters per channel are used here, which divide the high and low frequencies among themselves. On top of that, the CR-Buds+ are significantly better equipped: You have the choice between more than four pairs of adapters and a transport case is included.

However, the CR-Buds+ don’t have the sound despite the higher technical effort fully in line with our recommendations. The sound is nicely differentiated and also delivers a solid bass foundation, but the upper mids are sometimes a bit too cheeky, which is not always an advantage, especially with vocals. If you value lavish equipment and like to play with the smartphone’s sound controls, you still get a well-equipped set with potential.

CYBR PNK

The CYBR PNK are very well made and generously equipped with four pairs of eartips and a hard case for storage. The in-ears themselves are magnetic, so they can be clicked together when not in use.

1

by < p>3

Even the wearing comfort of the CYBR PNK is very good. The only drawback is unfortunately the poor sound quality. The PNK sound very dull, compared to the competition, there is clearly a lack of midrange and treble. Even the bass is more undefined than crisp.

Teufel Move

The Move by Teufel shines with a smart design. Unfortunately, the conspicuous red cable tends to knot, which can lead to cable breaks and worse over time. Only three adapters are supplied. Together with the headphones, everything fits into the high-quality, beautiful case. In terms of sound, the Move presents itself in a positive sense as an inconspicuous all-round in-ear. He plays everything that is offered to him without stress and without having any particular preferences – apart from a slight increase in the presence range.

In-Ear -Headphones for around 100 euros

In the price range between 75 and 150 euros, the overall level of quality is already very high. For high-quality music playback, manufacturers are increasingly doing without the microphone, which is so important for smartphones. In-ears without a microphone are also suitable for playing music from a smartphone, but no longer for making phone calls, but who actually uses their smartphone to make mere phone calls.

It is also interesting that in this price range the connecting cables are increasingly designed to be pluggable. Fortunately, many manufacturers use the quasi-standard MMCX for this purpose, so that a defective cable can also be replaced with that of a third-party manufacturer. Manufacturers such as Shure also use this opportunity to make their in-ears even more versatile, for the Shure SE215 and other headphones there is even a pluggable Bluetooth unit .

Overview of treatments: Our recommendations

Test winner

Fiio FH3

Show all prices

TheFiio FH3 are quite massive, which is due to the generous use of metal in the housing of the in-ears. As usual with in-ears with cables that are routed behind the ears, some dexterity is required at first. But then they sit securely in the ears and sound excellent.

Also good

Final E4000

< /p>Show all prices< /span>

The Final E4000 is the second most expensive in-ear from the E series. Here, too, the cables are plugged into the in-ears, using the proven MMCX standard. Like all their colleagues, the E4000 are very easy to place in the correct place in the ear and develop a natural, airy sound there. If you prefer to lay the cable behind your ears to avoid the so-called microphonics, you will find the right brackets for cable routing in the scope of delivery.

When money doesn’t matter

Ikko Obsidian OH10

Show all prices

The cases of the Ikko Obsidian OH10 are said to be made of copper, see with the surface and the coloring more like the eponymous rock. The supplied accessories also follow an idiosyncratic design, the carrying case alone, also made of leather, is a real eye-catcher. Tonally, on the other hand, there are no experiments: Here it is neutral, but with enormous joy of playing. In addition, the in-ears can be used surprisingly well despite their extravagant shape.

Price tip

Shure SE215

Show all prices

The Shure SE215 is a real long-running favorite, originally intended as a cheap in-ear for stage monitoring he hardly hides his professional background. The connection cables have always been plugged in here, so that the SE215 can be offered in different versions. It now costs less than 100 euros and has become our price tip.

Comparison table

Test winner

Fiio FH3

Also good

Final E4000

When money doesn’t matter

Ikko Obsidian OH10

Price tip

Shure SE215

Ikko Meteor OH1

Final VR3000

1More E1010

Teufel Move Pro

Bose SoundSport

• Excellent Sound
• Great workmanship
• Extensive range of accessories
• Cable can be plugged in according to the MMCX standard

• Insert is a bit fiddly

• Excellent sound
• Very easy to use
• Comfortable fit
• Cable pluggable

• A little more punch in the deep bass would be nice

• Very good sound
• Great design
• High wearing comfort

• Proprietary connector system

• Excellent, balanced sound experience
• Large equipment
• Cable can be plugged in and even exchanged for a Bluetooth module

• Insert is a bit fiddly, as with all in-ears with cables laid behind the ear

• Excellent Sound
• Easy to use
• Extensive, high-quality accessories

• Plug not protected against polarity reversal

• Very good, balanced sound experience
• Comfortable fit
• Reasonable price

< ul>

Few accessories

• Really balanced sound with slight bass emphasis
• Including adapter for hi-fi system

• Very good workmanship
• Very good sound
• Good cable

• Fine drawing is coming not quite close to our favourite

• Fits securely in the ear
• Good for sporting use

• Not quite as good in sound as the others

< /p>

Price comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparison Price comparisonPrice comparisonPrice comparison

Show product details

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

24 Ohm

114 dB

1,2m abnehmbar

9 Paar Silikon-, 2 Paar Foam-Passstücke, Transport-Case, Hardcase, Reinigungspinsel

20 Gramm

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

15 Ohm

97 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

5 Paar Passstücke, Ohrbügel, Karabiner, Transport-Case

6 Gramm

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

18 Ohm

106 dB

1,3 m ohne Mikrofon

6 Paar Passstücke, Transporttasche

36 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

20 Ohm

107 dB

1,27 m mit Mikrofon

3 Paar Passstücke, Reinigungsstäbchen, Transporttasche

10 Gramm

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

18 Ohm

106 dB

1,2 m ohne Mikrofon

6 Paar Passstücke, Hardcase

17 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

101 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

5 Paar Passstücke, Ear-Hooks, Transportbeutel

12 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

32 Ohm

99 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon

9 Paar Passstücke, 3,5mm auf 6,3mm-Adapter, Flugzeugadapter

12 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

32 Ohm

112 dB

1,3 m mit Mikrofon

Kleidungs-Clip, 3 versch. Paar Silikon-Ohrpassstücke, Hardcase, Aufwickelhilfe

16 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

45 Ohm

k. A.

1,15 m mit Mikrofon

3 Paar Passstücke, Transportbox, Kabelclip

18 Gramm

Testsieger: Fiio FH3

Zugegeben, um die Fiio FH3 korrekt ins Ohr einzusetzen und die Kabel hinters Ohr zu verlegen, braucht es schon ein wenig Routine. Sind die Kabelbögen einmal angepasst, lassen sich die Fiios problemlos in die Ohren einsetzen, um dort erstaunlich komfortabel sitzen zu bleiben.

Testsieger

Fiio FH3

Alle Preise anzeigen

Like most of the competitors in this price range, the cables of the Fiio FH3 are also pluggable to the in-ears. This makes it easy to swap out if the cable breaks, and because Fiio supports the MMXC standard, it doesn’t even have to be the original. However, it will probably take some time before the cable fails as it seems quite solid.

1

by

3

The transport box that comes with the Fiio FH3 is also solid. In addition to this waterproof hard box, there is also a soft fabric case for storing the in-ears if you want something a little fancier. A row of eartips made of different materials in different sizes is included with the Fiios, sorted and neatly stored in small bags.

There is sure to be a suitable set for everyone, so that Fiio FH3 comfortably in your ears and unfold their excellent sound there. The FH3 deliver the complete range from deep bass to cleanly resolving mids and brilliant highs. Nothing is exaggerated and nothing is left out, they reproduce all timbres perfectly and are even able to display a three-dimensional sound image with the appropriate input.

Alternatives

We recommend other models in this price range and would like to present them below.

The challenger: Final E4000

The Final E4000 is much easier to put in the ear than our favorite. In principle, you don’t have to thread the cables behind your ears, although this is also possible with the E4000, the appropriate brackets for cable routing are included.

That’s good too

Final E4000

Show all prices

Normally, the Final E4000 are simply guided in the direction of the auditory canal and almost automatically find the right place. One of the reasons for this is that they are easier to guide because of their design. In addition, as with the entire E series, the manufacturer has pre-embossed the connecting flanges of the adapters and these themselves accordingly, so that they easily follow the natural, slight curvature of the auditory canal. It’s simple, but effective and, above all, comfortable.

1

from

3

Used in this way, they only protrude slightly from the ear and the cables simply fall down. Disadvantage of this wearing method: Noises caused by the cable rubbing against clothing are almost completely transmitted to the in-ears and thus to the ears. If you now lay the cable behind your ears, the friction and the corresponding background noise are over. If you need it, you can use the brackets for cable routing – we could do without it.

Do the Final E4000 sit correctly in place firstly, they seal very well, secondly, they sit fairly securely and are also very comfortable in the ears. The sound is not entirely dissimilar to that of the in-ears from Shure. In comparison, the E4000 lack at most the last punch in the low-frequency range. But they make up for it with an extraordinarily airy performance of the mid-high range. They don’t reach as deep into the bass range as the Shure, but they don’t try to conceal this by increasing the level in the upper bass either, but always remain honest and natural.

Luxurious: Ikko Obsidian OH10

The name is no coincidence, the Ikko Obsidian OH10 does indeed look like it’s made of the glass-like volcanic rock. However, the supposed breaking edges and the glossy dark finish hide the actual material very effectively – the driver housing of the Obsidian OH10 is said to be made of copper. Even though I didn’t want to scratch the paintwork to verify that, we’ll take it from the manufacturer.

When money doesn’t matter

Ikko Obsidian OH10

Show all prices

The Obsidian OH10 have more to offer than an individual go through jewel. The cable is coiled, which is purely for visual reasons, and it is also plugged into the driver housing. Plug and housing can be clearly distinguished from left and right by means of colored rings. However, the Ikko in-ears use neither MMCX nor any other connection that clearly identifies the plug-in direction.

1

by < p>3

You can easily wire the Ikko with the wrong polarity, with the result that the musical stage does not clearly span between right and left, but the music seems to sound somewhere diffuse in the room. At that point at the latest, you should change the cable in one of the two in-ears. Incidentally, according to the manufacturer, the correct polarity results from the connection of the cable bend and the driver housing, after all the cables should wind forward out of the ears. In our opinion, a color marking or, better yet, a fixed groove that specifies the plug-in direction would be the better solution.

Once they sit in the ear, which is surprisingly easy, are connected correctly and are supplied with the appropriate musical lining , this faux pas can be quickly forgotten. Now the Obsidian OH10 is very close to the sound quality of our favourite, here too it goes dry and deep into the bass cellar and the connection of the mid-high range via a beautiful basic tone leaves nothing to be desired. It sounds a bit airier in the mid-high range, although we don’t presume to determine which is better. It’s just a different sound character. Once the problem with the insertion direction of the cable has been solved, the Obsidian OH10 spoils With very good wearing comfort, an excellent sound experience and also offers the charm of a fine piece of jewellery, real leather case included.

Price tip: Shure SE215

Even with the classics from Shure , the SE215 requires the cables to be routed behind the ear. For this reason, namely for individual adjustment and for a secure hold, the connection cables are slightly stiffer in the ear bow than in the rest of the course. As a result, they can be bent behind the ear to fit and then retain this shape as far as possible, so that the procedure is easier to use the second time.

Price tip

Shure SE215

Show all prices

Our test samples are equipped with a universal remote control and the obligatory microphone. The SE215 remote control works thanks to a small switch on both Android smartphones and iPhones. The only requirement is, of course, that the smartphone still has a headset jack or at least an appropriate adapter for the USB-C or Lightning jack.

1

from

3

Three ear tips or adapters are included with the Shure SE215, but all three are made of Comply foam and are therefore the first choice. Together with the cable and the in-ears, everything fits into the transport bag, which is made of durable canvas. Markings on the cables as well as on the in-ears identify the left and right channel, which means that confusion is largely ruled out. The transport bag is also equipped with a practical carabiner so that it can be easily attached to a belt, backpack or other accessories.

Even if putting it into the ears is not quite as easy as with some other in- Ears, the little effort is rewarded. There are hardly any headphones in this price range that sound better: The SE215 offer a rich punch in the bass, brilliant highs and beautifully resolved mids, with none of the frequency ranges being particularly good is preferred. They reproduce all tones perfectly and even create a three-dimensional sound pattern if the recordings are perfect.

Also tested

Ikko Meteor OH1

The Ikko Meteor OH1 are slightly cheaper than the Obsidian OH10. On the outside, there is only a color difference, and the edges of the housing are not the same for all Ikko in-ears anyway. What you don’t see: The case of the Meteors is made of an aluminum alloy, while the slightly more expensive siblings are made of copper.

1

from

3

The equipment of the Meteor OH1 corresponds to that of the siblings, including a pluggable connection cable, a large number of different eartips and of course the leather storage bag with a leather cord to tie it.

In terms of sound, the Meteor OH1 recognize the same signature as the OH10, but they don’t reach quite as far down into the bass cellar and don’t let the highs shine quite as brightly, which can only be seen in a direct A-B comparison noticed. Basically, the differences are actually very small and you can ultimately decide which Ikko suits you better based on the looks.

Final VR3000

< p>The Final VR3000 packaging has the word Gaming prominently displayed on it. Now one can legitimately ask oneself how to make wired headphones suitable for gaming, after all the latency, i.e. the signal delay, does not play a role here. It’s different with Bluetooth headphones, of course, because the way over the radio link can be decisive.

1

by

3

For the manufacturer, the VR3000 was about other qualities that could definitely be interesting for gamers. First there is the design, which is so completely different than what we know from the other final in-ears. In addition, the cables can also be laid behind the ears. This provides additional support when things get down to business, especially since the supplied guide brackets keep the cable in place.

However, the manufacturer has paid particular attention to the most spatial imaging of the sound possible, and that too is an important feature of gaming headphones.

Ultimately, the spatial imaging capability of the VR3000 of course depends on what you give it offers. During playback, you can clearly hear the tuning known from the other, sometimes more expensive, final in-ears. The VR3000 turns out to be fairly balanced headphones that could do with a bit more bass pressure. Of course, he is also able to give the sound a realistic three-dimensionality if the source allows it. Above all, it is comparatively cheap and, on top of that, very well equipped.

1More E1010

The 1More E1010 is currently just over 100 euros and offers the finest high-tech inside. A combination of four drivers per earpiece ensures a very special sound. In addition to the headphones, a solid case also includes the adapters, neatly separated according to diameter, an airplane adapter and a 6.3 mm jack adapter for connecting to the hi-fi system. The 1More E1010 primarily delivers deep, rich bass, which, however, is at the expense of the mid-high tones, which sound quite dull in comparison. When it comes to wearing comfort, however, there are no compromises; the E1010 is easy to insert and then sits comfortably in the ear.

1

of

3

< /p>

Bose SoundSport

The Bose SoundSport sits just as securely in the ear and comes in trendy colors because that probably looks sportier. In terms of sound, however, the headphones fall a good deal behind the SoundTrue Ultra from the same company. The SoundTrue Ultra is just as weatherproof as the SoundSport. Due to the much better sound, the SoundTrue Ultra is the better deal – despite the slightly higher price.

In-ear headphones over 200 euros

In the price range over 200 euros, manufacturers often saddle up with significantly better workmanship and better sound. Interestingly, most expensive in-ears sound almost unspectacular when you first listen. Here, too, there is now and then the currently popular sound with raised bass, but that is much more subtle than in most lower price regions. Overall, it is much more important that only the music sounds and that the listeners develop as little of their own sound as possible.

They don’t save on accessories either, but they don’t necessarily rely on mass, but rather on quality and Design. No manufacturer will dare to include a simple transport bag made of fabric with its valuables. In terms of sound, sophisticated, expensive technology can also be used to make up ground, and manufacturers are rarely content with using just one driver per channel. Similar to loudspeakers, different drivers are assigned different frequencies, but the art here is to make the transitions as seamless as possible and therefore inaudible.

Especially beyond the 200 euro threshold, small but fine manufacturers from all over the world are increasingly bustling about world, which often have their own development and even production facilities. However, in order to be able to survive in the large market of in-ear headphones with small quantities, such an in-ear must also look good, so there is a whole range of interesting designs using some new materials. In doing so, we have discovered quite a few euphonious gems for you.

Although the differences only describe nuances and are often only perceived at all in direct comparison – here one speaks more of different sound characters than of better or worse sound – we have taken the trouble to listen as closely as possible in order to provide a comprehensible description of the sound. The test winner is then not the headphone with the best sound, but rather with the most coherent overall concept of wearing comfort, operation and the most natural possible reproduction “>Brief overview: Our recommendations

Test winner

Sennheiser IE 80 S

< /p>Show all prices< /span>

The Sennheiser IE 80 S is just for the well-groomed Music enjoyment designed, so there is no microphone and no remote control. They can be worn behind the ear with or without cables, appropriate guide brackets are included, and the bass reproduction can be slightly increased using small adjusters. Various adapters – also those from Comply – a cleaning and adjustment tool as well as a case in which everything can be accommodated round off the overall package. It also plays very complex music seamlessly without emphasizing parts of the frequency range unless you turn up the bass control.

That’s fine too

< h3 class="product-box-headline product-box-headline--secondary">Meze Rai Solo

Show all prices

Den Meze Rai Solo you can see immediately that no material was saved here. The in-ears are made of polished stainless steel, and five drivers per channel work inside – one part BA and one part dynamic driver. For this reason, they are not among the smallest and lightest in-ears, but they still sit comfortably in the ears and develop an excellent sound experience there.

More expensive and better

Mackie MP-360

Show all prices

The Mackie MP 360 is the middle of Mackie’s three most recent creations. It has three drivers each using balanced armature technology (BA drivers) to which the transmission range is distributed. Two plug-in cables are included as standard, one with and one without a microphone. The MP-360 can thus develop its excellent sound both on the smartphone and on the hi-fi device.

Price tip

Shure AONIC 3

Show all prices

Even if the Shure AONIC 3 by design deviate significantly from the colleagues from their own company, in terms of equipment with many useful accessories, the manufacturer is not stingy here either. The sound even benefits from the design, which is rather unusual for Shure. The AONIC 3 are so much easier to use correctly.

comparison table

test winner

Sennheiser IE 80 S

Also good

Meze Rai Solo

More expensive and better

Mackie MP-360

Price tip

Shure AONIC 3

Mackie MP-320

Oriveti OH300

Final E5000

Shure AONIC 4

Mackie MP- 460

Shure SE425

Westone UM Pro 20

Etymotic ER3SE

• Excellent, fine-resolution sound
• Individual bass adjustment
• Comfortable fit

• Excellent sound with a rich bass foundation
• Comfortable seat
• Extensive equipment

• Quite difficult

• Excellent, fine-resolution sound with enormous depth
• Two Connection cable included (one with microphone)
• Designed for hi-fi system and smartphone

• Great sound
• Extensive equipment
• Comfortable seat
• Option ales Bluetooth module

• Excellent sound with slight loudness characteristics
• Comprehensive features

• Outstanding, dynamic sound
• Best equipped for mobile and stationary use

• Cable a bit stubborn

• Excellent sound
• Very comfortable to wear

• Quite tight equipment

• Excellent, fine-resolution sound
• Very well equipped
• Optional Bluetooth module

• It takes some getting used to

• Excellent, balanced sound with high transmission range
• Extensive features

• Quite expensive

• Very good sound
• Extensive equipment

• Unstubborn when inserted into the ear

• Very good sound
• Waterproof transport case

• Low bass foundation

• Wide, open sound image
• Cable plugged in

< li>Must be inserted fairly deep into the ear canal

PreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleichPreisvergleich

Produktdetails einblenden

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

16 Ohm

116 dB

1,2 m ohne Mikrofon

9 Paar Passstücke (davon 3 Paar Comply), 1 Satz Ohrbügel,Reinigungswerkzeug, Transport-Case

5 Gramm

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

20 Ohm

105 dB

1,3 m ohne Mikrofon

8 Paar Passstücke, Hardcase

23 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker, 3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

15,5 Ohm

117 dB

je 1,4 m mit Mikrofon und 1,4 m ohne Mikrofon

12 Paar Passstücke (9 x Silikon (mit Tannenbaum-), 3 x Comply Foam, Hardcase, Reinigungs-Werkzeug, verdrilltes MMCX HiFi-Kabel, 1 Kabel mit 3-Tasten Fernbedienung und Mikrofon, 1 x 6,3 mm Adapter

15 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

26 Ohm

108 dB

1,2 m mit Mikrofon steckbar

9 Paar Passstücke (3 x Silikon, 4 x Comply, 1 x Schaumstoff, 1 x 3-fach Tipps), Hardcase, Reinigungs-Werkzeug, Kabel mit Fernbedienung und Mikrofon, 6,3-mm Adapter

6 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker, 3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

15,5 Ohm

100 dB

je 1,4 m mit Mikrofon und 1,4 m ohne Mikrofon

12 Paar Passstücke (9 x Silikon (mit Tannenbaum-), 3 x Comply Foam, Hardcase, Reinigungs-Werkzeug, verdrilltes MMCX HiFi-Kabel, 1 Kabel mit 3-Tasten Fernbedienung und Mikrofon, 1 x 6,3 mm Adapter

15 Gramm

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

13 Ohm

108 dB

1,2 m ohne Mikrofon

10 Paar Passstücke (6 x Silikon, 2 x Comfort-Foam, 2 x Doppelflanschaufsätze), Transport-Case(Echtleder), Reinigungswerkzeug, Flugzeug-und 6,35-mm-Adapter

15 Gramm

3,5-mm-3-Pol-Klinkenstecker

14 Ohm

93 dB

1,2 m ohne Mikrofon

5 Paar Passstücke, Transporttasche

8 Gramm

3,5-mm-4-Pol-Klinkenstecker

7 Ohm

106 dB

1.2 m pluggable with microphone

9 pairs of adapters (3 x silicone , 4 x Comply, 1 x foam, 1 x triple tips), hard case, cleaning tool, cable with remote control and microphone, 6.3 mm adapter

6 grams

3.5mm 4-pin jack, 3.5mm 3-pin jack

15.5 ohms

118 dB

1.4 m each with microphone and 1.4 m without microphone

12 pairs of adapters (9 x silicone (with Christmas tree), 3 x Comply Foam, hard case, cleaning tool, twisted MMCX HiFi cable, 1 cable with 3-button remote control and microphone, 1 x 6.3 mm adapter

15 grams

3.5 mm 4-pin jack plug

22 Ohm

109 dB

1.6 m with microphone

8 pairs of adapters (including 1 pair of foam), cleaning tool, transport case
6.3 mm adapter

11 grams

3, 5 mm 3-pin jack

27 Ohm

119 dB

1.3 m without microphone

10 Pair of adapters (5 x silicone, 5 x TRUE-FIT Comfort-Foam), hard case, cleaning tool, transport box

14 grams

3.5mm 3-pin jack plug

22 ohms< /p>

102 dB

1.2 m without microphone

2 pairs of 3-flange silicone, 1 pair of foam eartips, wax filter, case

7 grams

Test winner : Sennheiser IE 80 S

Actually, the in-ears of the Sennheiser IE 80 S look less comfortable than they really do because of their cube shape are. They can be used surprisingly well in the ear, you can even lay the cable behind your ears, the corresponding brackets for cable routing are also included. By laying the cable behind the ears, the cable noise is reduced, which is transmitted directly to the in-ears through friction on clothing – i.e. the microphonics – are significantly reduced again. I didn’t really need the hangers though.

Test winner

Sennheiser IE 80 S

< p>

All Show prices

The IE 80 S are the cheapest in-ears from Sennheiser, which should also meet audiophile demands. Perhaps one of the reasons why an inline microphone was deliberately omitted, as was a remote control for answering calls. Nevertheless, you can also listen to music from your smartphone with the IE 80S, just not make calls. However, the Sennheiser prefers high-resolution fare here, which many smartphones are also capable of, especially if the music is provided by the corresponding streaming services. Alternatively, the IE 80S can of course also be operated on a mobile audio player or even on the home stereo system, then with a 6.35 mm jack adapter, which is not included in the scope of delivery.

Supplied with the < span rel="noopener sponsored" target="_blank">Sennheiser IE 80 S includes eight pairs of ear tips in different sizes, five in silicone design, three from Comply. In addition, there are brackets for laying the cable behind the ears, a tool for cleaning and adjusting the bass performance and, last but not least, a nice case in which the in-ears and accessories can be stored on the go.

< p class="slider slider-counter slider--oversize">

1

from

4

As usual in this price range, the cables of the IE 80 S are plugged into the in-ears. However, Sennheiser does not rely on the widespread quasi-standard of an MMCX connection, but uses an in-house connector system. Instead of the practical coaxial arrangement of the plugs, there are two slim pins as plug contacts, but the sensitive pins are well protected against damage and polarity reversal, but only Sennheiser can replace them.

The Sennheiser sits very comfortably in the ears, whether you put the cable behind your ears or not. The biggest advantage of laying the cable behind your ears is certainly the lack of friction noise, which is otherwise caused by the cable rubbing against clothing – the so-called microphonics.

When used correctly, the IE 80S sounds very natural and balanced , with a dry bass that also reaches very far down, but never becomes superficial. The fundamental and mid-highs join seamlessly. The Sennheiser creates the balance of depicting everything and illuminating all the details on the one hand, while still reproducing the music in all its complexity as if from a single source. When delivered, the small bass control is set to the left stop and thus to the minimum. After a small turn with the associated tool about halfway, the IE 80S steps up again at the bottom and, for example, puts the double bass on ZAZ “Effet Miroir” into focus a bit more. If you want more, you can do that – but with music that is already bass-oriented, that can be too much. As I said, even in the minimum position, that’s completely sufficient, at least if the picture shows it.

The Sennheiser IE 80 S is a very successful pair of in-ear headphones. The good equipment, including sufficient ear tips, is one of the basics for its high wearing comfort, because you like to listen to music for a long time. If you really want to make phone calls with the in-ear, you should listen to one of the alternatives with a microphone.

Alternatives

< p>Even in the price range over 200 euros, there are other recommendations that represent a real alternative to the test winner. We present them below.

Challengers: Meze Rai Solo

The Meze Rai Solo belong to The Romanian manufacturer in the middle price segment, five drivers per channel work in the stainless steel housing, an enormous technical effort for the price called.

Also good

Meze Rai Solo

Show all prices

Of course, these drivers take up a lot of space, which is why the Rai Solo’s cases aren’t exactly the smallest. Nevertheless, they can be fitted perfectly into the ear and sit comfortably in their place, the cables are routed behind the ears, which also works extremely well with the flexible models that come with the Rai Solo.

1

from

3

The cables are plugged in as is customary in this class, using the tried-and-tested MMCX connector system. The rest of the equipment is also standard in this class: both the in-ears and the cable plugs are clearly color-coded. A total of eight pairs of adapters, two of which are Comply versions, are included in the set. The airplane adapter and the cleaning tool with brush are almost standard, and the adapter to a 6.35 mm jack is a nice bonus. Everything can be stored together in the beautiful hard case.

The Rai Solo sound unspectacular at first but the ensemble understands it after just a few bars, let the band or the orchestra appear in your mind’s eye piece by piece. It has a rich bass foundation, which is followed by a pronounced fundamental tone. The high-frequency range is pleasantly rounded off, so hissing sibilants are alien to the Meze.

In terms of price, the Meze Rai Solo is roughly on the same level as the Sennheiser, but it offers a completely different sound characteristic that will certainly find just as many friends.

Luxurious: Mackie MP-360

The Mackie MP-360 is the middle of three new In -Ears by the studio outfitter Mackie, which affects both the price and the technical features. There are three balanced armature drivers in each of the two in-ears, which ensure good sound across the entire frequency range.

More expensive and better

< p class="product-box-headline product-box-headline--secondary">Mackie MP-360

Show all prices

With the MP-360 you can thanks to the transparent plastic housing you can even see the technology. In addition to the logos, only the right-left identifier is clearly printed, otherwise the view of the individual drivers and their cabling is clear.

The connection to the two cables included in the scope of delivery is made with professional MMCX plug connection established. One of the connection cables is optimized with a remote and microphone for operation on a smartphone, the second comes without any such sound-influencing aids for puristic hi-fi enjoyment. Alternatively, this and the other MP in-ears can be upgraded to a Bluetooth in-ear with the MP-BTA adapter.

< p>1

of

3

On the MP-360 A total of twelve pairs of eartips in different designs are included, including three sizes in Comply Foam. For the sake of order, all variants are packed in separate bags. A 6.35 mm adapter is included for connection to the home stereo system, and of course a cleaning tool should not be missing. The whole thing is housed in a hard case that can be securely attached to a belt or wherever else with a carabiner.

The in-ears are quickly inserted and, with the appropriate ear tips, sit perfectly in the ears . Now the Mackie MP-360 can perfectly develop their sonic potential. From the deepest bass to the highest treble, the in-ears explore the audible frequency range to its limits. The deep bass has the appropriate emphasis and presence where it should be without exaggerating, a very fine fundamental range then provides the seamless transition to the mid-tones. The musical stage is very well staggered in depth and breadth.

Of the three new MP in-ears from Mackie, the MP-360< is the best /span> clearly the best investment for us. The distance to the cheaper MP-320 matches the price difference, but the surcharge to the more expensive MP-460 can hardly be justified.

Price tip: Shure AONIC 3

With the Shure AONIC 3, it is immediately noticeable that it does not correspond to the housing design that Shure is used to, but it should here the connection cable can be laid behind the ear. If the AONIC 3 are inserted correctly, they protrude unusually far, which only bothers aesthetes or if you should lie on your ear while listening to music. ????

Price tip

Shure AONIC 3

Show all prices

In terms of equipment with a wide variety of eartips, there is nothing to complain about with the Shure AONIC 3. Of course, the obligatory cleaning tool and the adapter for the large 6.3 millimeter jack socket are also included, as is the spacious hard case, where everything can be stowed away.

1

of

3

Although the cables are also routed behind the ears, the AONIC 3 can be used better than the classic Shure in-ears. Ultimately, the elongated housing allows for easier guidance and they do not have to be fitted into the ear cups, the so-called concha. As easy as putting the in-ears in your ears, the cable is just as short behind your ears.

The principle of music playback is AONIC 3 but no surprise. They sound very similar to the Fiio, but deliver a slightly finer midrange resolution, which usually gives voices a touch more warmth. These listeners also manage to make the distance to the artist disappear quite a bit – a specialty of almost all in-ears from Shure.

For the price of almost 200 euros you get musical and also The equipment rarely offers more than the AONIC 3.

Also tested

Mackie MP-320

Price is the Mackie MP-320 at the lower end of the MP series, but it still packs the same lavish equipment as its more expensive colleagues. Technically, it is not quite as well equipped, in the transparent in-ears there are three drivers in each case, as in the MP-360, but instead of the more complex balanced armature types, there are the somewhat cheaper dynamic drivers.

< p class="slider slider-counter slider--oversize">

1

from

3

This hardly detracts from the sound: The Mackie MP 320 also deliver a wide frequency range and reproduce complex sound structures in a finely differentiated manner and with enormous depth. The desired slight loudness character ensures a decent sonority and an impressive spatial image even on weak smartphones or at lower levels.

Oriveti OH300

The most striking feature of the Oriveti OH300 is probably the elaborately twisted connection cable, which is also quite thick for in-ear headphones. Nevertheless, it is so flexible that it can be worn comfortably behind the ears when the in-ears are in the ear. The Oriveti set also does not require a microphone, in line with audiophile style. It is fitting that, in addition to various ear tips, a 6.35 mm jack adapter for use with the home hi-fi system is also included.

The housings of the in-ears are quite large and the twisted connection cable could do with it almost do justice to a full-grown speaker. Nevertheless, the Orivetis can be placed in the ears fairly easily. Unfortunately, the in-ears don’t have a Re/Li marking, but the plugs on the cable ends do. As it quickly turns out, the Oriveti lettering is on the right case, and the logo in the form of an open »O« is on the left case.

1

of

3

The sound that the Oriveti OH300 reproduce is immediately very similar to that of the favorite. The Oriveti are a bit more gripping at the bottom, however, you almost feel the bass more than you hear it. With the Sennheisers, this can only be compensated for slightly with the bass increase, because the Orivetis simply go deeper. Overall, they come across as a bit more dynamic and are simply more fun.

Final E5000

The Final E5000 is the most expensive of the E-series, it has the same slim design as its colleagues and has the same technology that fits perfectly into the auditory canal. A bracket for laying the cable behind the ears is included, so that it is very comfortable to wear. The E5000 exercises some restraint in the bass, especially compared to the favorite. Nevertheless, the final plays very pleasantly in the basic tone, voices are reproduced sonorous, in the mid-range and the seamlessly connected mid-high range the E5000 proves to be almost incorruptibly precise.

Shure AONIC 4

The Shure AONIC 4 corresponds to the design known from Shure, as already used in the SE215 can be found with the cable routing behind the ears. In the housing, however, the AONIC 4 has been properly upgraded: Two drivers are used each, one classic, dynamic and one that works according to the balanced armature principle (BA).

1

from

4

First of all, this design principle promises a larger transmission range and also a better controlled reproduction of the individual frequency bands, since each of the two drivers only generates a part of the audible frequencies, ideally those for which it is specialized.

< p>So much for the theory. The Shure AONIC 4 actually does its job very well. The prerequisite is that it sits correctly in the ear, which, as usual, requires some fiddling because of the rather stubborn connection cable.

If everything fits correctly, it actually delivers a somewhat more spacious sound than, for example, the AONIC 3. The bandwidth also seems a bit larger, which, as is so often the case, can only be seen in a direct AB comparison.

Mackie MP-460

The Mackie MP-460 is third in the group and also the most expensive of the current Mackie MP series. As with the other models, the driver electronics can be admired through the transparent plastic housing, and it’s quite something. A total of four BA drivers per in-ear share the work of reproducing the audible frequencies.

The Mackie MP-460 also comes with a total of twelve pairs of eartips. A 6.35 mm adapter, the obligatory cleaning tool and the hard case for storage are not missing here either. There is no question that the expensive MP-460 also has two connection cables that are connected via MMCX connectors, one with a microphone and one without.

The MP 460 has a touch more resolution in the mid-high range than the 360, is a bit more reserved in the low bass and manages the transition to the upper bass/midrange a little better and also has a very finely differentiated fundamental range.

Shure SE425

The Shure SE425 is even more lavishly equipped than the SE215, a total of eight pairs of different adapters are included, four of which are in memory foam, a 6.3 mm adapter for connection to the HiFi system and a transport case are included. An inline microphone and a universal remote control are integrated in the cable. Universal because you can switch between Android and iOS with a small switch on the back.

However, the cable for laying behind the ear is even more stubborn than with the cheap SE215, so inserting it is correspondingly cumbersome. In terms of sound, the upper mids are particularly emphasized in the Shure, which is a little at the expense of the fundamental tone, the transition from the low-frequency range to the lower mids is somewhat underrepresented. Compared to the competition, however, this borders on bean counting and is a question of musical taste.

Westone UM Pro 20

TheUM Pro 20 comes from Westone, a company whose core business is actually professional hearing protection. However, this would not be the first manufacturer to use its know-how for high-fidelity purposes and thereby open up a new field of activity. The drivers of the Westone UM Pro 20 are self-confidently housed in transparent housings, as it should be, the cables are also plugged in here and prepared for laying behind the ears.

The UM Pro 20 are not stingy with accessories: ten in total A couple of adapters are included, five of which are made of memory foam and five of silicone, and a cleaning tool is also included. The real unique selling point of the Westone in-ears, however, is the transport case in which everything is housed. This eye-catching, orange-colored box can be completely locked and is then even completely waterproof. Ideal for canoeists and other water sports enthusiasts.

1

of

3

The UM Pro 20 should therefore fit in every ear and be able to unfold musically accordingly. However, they have a fairly prominent midrange, which can hardly be influenced even with different adapters. Only a somewhat more solid basic tone and bass range can be achieved after careful adjustment, which puts the presence of the midrange into perspective.

Etymotic ER3SE

The Etymotic ER3SE and its brother, the ER3XR, also both have no headset functions, so they are fully tuned for sound. In view of the workmanship and equipment, there is hardly anything to criticize about the Etymotic headphones. They are slim, light and – provided they are used correctly – are hardly noticeable. The cables are plugged in as usual and can be easily replaced in the event of a defect. However, the equipment only includes four pairs of adapters, which at first glance seem a bit meager in this price range. However, three pairs are kept in a so-called 3-flange or fir tree design, so that they get bigger and bigger on the outside and should basically seal every ear. Another pair is made of foam, is quite large, but can be kneaded nice and small, so that it will easily seal most ears, for which the others are a bit too nasty.

The equipment is rounded off with two tiny replacement filters that sit in front of the sound opening, and a tool that is used both for changing the filter and for cleaning the tiny opening. A nice, solid case is obligatory at this price.

Inserting the headphones is not entirely trivial, they should be as close as possible to the eardrum. So put the adapters on and carefully insert them into the ear canal, then move them up at a slight angle – and don’t worry, even if they look a bit brute: the Christmas tree adapters are made of soft silicone and fit very comfortably.

The effort is rewarded with a wonderfully natural sound and very fine resolution in the mid-high range. When it comes to the bass, the spirits then separate, or rather the two listeners: while the Etymotic ER3SE reaches down to the deepest bass cellar without even a little bit more the ER3XR raises the bar a little bit. It does this so discreetly that it really only really stands out in an A-B comparison. Both have in common the excellent resolution capability across all frequencies and a breathtakingly large stage, provided the recording allows for it. You will never miss the headset with either of the two handsets.

This is how we tested

We are constantly testing the latest in-ear headphones, we have now tested a total of 93 in-ears. We check the processing quality and features of all in-ear headphones. Here we pay particular attention to the equipment with many eartips or adapters, which on the one hand ensure a comfortable fit and on the other hand a good seal. Both have an impact on the wearing comfort and the sound. Finally, to assess the sound quality, we carry out extensive listening tests with the entire spectrum of different music genres.

The price also plays a role in the final evaluation. Since the price range for in-ear headphones is enormous, we divide our recommendations into four price ranges: under 30 euros, around 50 euros, around 100 euros and over 200 euros.

The most important questions

Which in-ears fit best in the ear?

< p>Among other things, the adapters or eartips are responsible for a good fit and thus a perfect fit, which is why different sizes are always included, with many headphones there are different materials in addition to the different sizes. With the so-called one-fits-all design, the first earpods from Apple, the in-ears are hooked into the conche (auricle) without adapters. Clever weight distribution ensures that they hold well even when moving. However, they do not seal the ear.

Which in-ears are the best?

That depends very much on how much money you want to invest. We have therefore made recommendations in four price ranges: up to 30 euros, around 50 euros, around 100 euros and over 200 euros.

Which in-ears are good for making phone calls?

Only in-ears that have a microphone are suitable for making phone calls, usually with a remote control in the cable is combined. We have entered in the equipment table whether a microphone is installed.

Do I have to throw away my in-ears if the cable is defective?

Unfortunately, this is actually the case with many cheap in-ears. However, manufacturers are increasingly equipping the in-ears with pluggable cables. You can get headphones like this with a changeable cable for less than 100 euros, which is definitely more sustainable than throwing them away.

Why should you still use wired headphones?

Bluetooth headphones are certainly more comfortable in some respects, but they should always be charged. In addition, Bluetooth transmission is always accompanied by losses in terms of sound quality, so if you value lossless transmission of high-resolution music (Hi-Res audio), you should use a cable connection. Incidentally, the manufacturer Shure makes the decision easy; In addition to the cable, there is also a Bluetooth module that you can simply plug in instead of the cable.

Do you need a transport case for in-ears?

First of all, such a case naturally protects the in-ears from dirt, and the cable is also protected more than if the Put the handset loosely in your pocket and then possibly pull it out by the cable.